The UltraFacility 2025 Conference gave a glimpse into some of the behind-the-scenes work that is developing the next-generation lights-out facility – one where robots and agentic AI make operations more repeatable and less manual.
In 2026. Intel and suppliers will give a progress update in a pre-conference workshop ‘Autonomous Operations: The Future of Lights-Out Facilities.’
It’s a space that is changing fast, with the scale of incoming change not fully realized by most of the supply chain. As Ryan Kovalchick, Operational Technology Architect and Snr. Global Manager at Intel warned in 2025, 'you will miss the boat, because it's coming.'
Here is a recap of the 5 key takeaways from last year's workshop to prepare you for UltraFacility 2026 (16–18 September in Phoenix, Arizona).
1. AI won't be everywhere
Let's throw AI at everything? No. Intel was explicit: put the right technology in the right place, judged by ROI and operational impact. Robots and sensors cost money, so the first decision isn't "where do we add AI", it’s about which assets are worth instrumenting how you match fixed sensors, mobile robots and people to each.
The issue isn't too much data, but how little gets used. SEEQ put it at around 85% of data going untouched. Operational data is scattered across the historians and control systems that log every sensor, and a raw reading on its own means little. The real work is contextualising it.
2. Facilities are a focus area for semiconductor digital transformation
The fab gets the attention, but the facility systems underneath it are where much of the early lights-out work is happening.
The payoff areas are utility usage optimization, and predictive maintenance to reduce downtime.
Here are 3 applications where this technology is already practical:
3. It is a response to a shortage of people on unscalable, manual work
The whole program is a response to a workforce problem. Technician roles aren't being backfilled, and the knowledge retiring outsizes what's coming in. The available workforce in five years’ time may be a third of today's while the workload doubles, and you cannot hire across that gap.
Boston Dynamics' Dan Zuba made the core case for the robot: manual inspection rounds are inherently inconsistent, because each technician brings a slightly different read on when a motor is running warm or a bearing sounds off. Robots turn a subjective assessment into a consistent record. The constraint, as Zuba framed it, is rarely a lack of data – it is whether that data is good, and consistency is what makes it good.
4. It connects teams across fab and facility
One interesting result came from breaking silos. Facilities data has traditionally sat apart from fab data. SEEQ's example is process cooling water: once you can see fab tool-load demand, you can make far better decisions about the cooling-water loops that serve it, e.g., how to run the system, and when maintenance is genuinely due, instead of running facilities blind to what the fab is doing.
5. Call to action for vendors
Intel's key message was aimed at the supply chain. A fab cannot go lights-out on equipment that needs a person to manually get the data out of it.
Amidst the industry’s largest buildout, understanding how the next generation of facilities will look very different to today’s is critical for your company’s strategy. Find out more at the workshop on September 16 2026 in Phoenix. Book your conference place for access.